2MASS Final Catalog Scan Selection

2MASS Final Catalog Scan Selection Criteria




Summary

The net result of scan selection based on final processing quality, net sensitivity ranking, and iteration to maximize sky coverage is that the all-sky release will be drawn from 59,731 scans. The list of scans comprising the all-sky release is given here.

Scan List for Final All-Sky Release

I. Useful Links Concerning Catalog Scan Selection

II. Scan Selection Criteria for 2MASS Final Catalog Generation

  1. Preparation

    1. Final scan quality scoring in place (QASIT)
    2. Position reconstruction quality noted
    3. General accounting

      • Summary of all scans of all survey and gap-fill scans
      • Validate that Working DB tables contain all final processed data
      • Decide how to handle Tiles with Q<5
      • Scan overlap statistics compiled
      • All "gaps" and identified


  2. First-Pass Scan Selection

    1. For each tile in full sky coverage plus gap-fill tiles, select scan of tile with the highest default score
    2. If there are multiple scans with identical default score, rank by considering relative quality and second order quality factors:

      • Primary sensitivity metrics:

        • Zero point offset (dm = ZP)
        • Seeing and Background (dm = -0.2*(PSP-PSP0))

      • Secondary quality indicators such as seeing stability (e.g. untracked seeing), background variations (e.g. airglow and banding), zero point stability, image aspect ratio, etc
      • Position reconstruction quality
      • Observation-time contiguity with adjacent scans
      • Observatory preference (e.g. CTIO vs. Mt. Hopkins)

      Issues: What are relative weights of different factors?
      Should secondary factors be allowed to override default quality score?



  3. Sky Coverage Iteration

    1. Determine Sky Coverage of preliminary full scan set using coverage and gap tables
    2. If any scan pair fails minimum overlap or gap tests, select alternative scan that has same default quality score and satisfies overlap, or next lowest score (above minimum score threshold)
    3. Iterate a-b until have full-sky coverage
    4. Issues: What is minimum overlap that should be allowed?
      Should overlap/gap consideration be allowed to override quality factors?

III. Accounting From Final Processing Results

IV. Scan Selection Proposal

V. Example - The Polar1 Catalog Generation Test Field

VI. Net Relative Sensitivity Ranking Overrides

Primary ranking and selection of scans with multiple observation at the same best quality is done according to the net relative sensitivity (NRS). Possibly override NRS ranking for scans with untracked seeing, anomalies on Atlas Images (bugs, residual meteor trails, etc) that can trigger false sources, or large astrometric reconstruction problems. How often would the NRS be overridden?

The following three tables list the tiles for which the NRS ranking would be overridden for the three category of problems.

The format of each file is as follows:

Untracked Seeing

Untracked seeing was handled primarily in nightly quality assurance, and most scans with it were downgraded. There are only two instances of where untracked seeing might override the NRS value. In the first case, tile 13074, the alternative scan has and effective sensitivity an average of 0.2 mags worse in each band, and has a potential image anomaly. In the second case, the alternative has a mean effective sensitivity 0.17 mags worse in each band. It is recommended that neither of these overrides be accepted.

Image Anomalies

All seven cases of possible NRS overrides due to image anomalies are caused by satellite or residual meteor trails left in the scans. In five of these, there is only a very short or no discernable residual trail on the Atlas Image. In two cases, tiles 101123 and 110095, there is a relatively bright trail on the Atlas Image. In both of these latter cases, the mean relative sensitivities per band of the alternative images are only ~2% lower than the highest NRS ranked scans.

It is recommended that the overrides for only the two tiles with the brightest residual image artifacts be allowed. The remaining five tiles should use the scans with the highest NRS ranking.

Astrometric Residuals

Of the 33 scans on Howard's list of problem scans, 21 are the only scans of tiles, so must be included in the release. 10 are scans of tiles for which there are higher quality scans available, so are not factors in overrides. Four scans have the same best quality as one other scan in their respective tiles, so are subject to driving overrides. Two of these are the lower NRS-ranked scans, so do not change the ranking. There are only two tiles with Nb>1 and where scans with astrometric reconstruction anomalies were the top-NRS-ranked scans. The alternative scan for first case, tile 101358, has only a small mean sensitivity deficit (~5%), and it is recommended that the alternative scan be used.

For the second case of astrometric error override, the alternative scan also has a large astrometric reconstruction error. Howard McCallon states that these scans are "equally bad," so there is no benefit for taking the less sensitive scan.

VII. Sky Coverage Iteration

The final adjustements to the scan selection consider when there are more than one scan of a Tile (or gap-fill Tile) available with the same score, and selection of one can improve the sky-coverage of the all-sky release. This is discussed in detail in the link above.

The end-result of the sky-coverage iteration is to settle on a list of 59,731 scans to be included in the final all-sky release. The list of scans comprising the all-sky release is given here.

Scan List for Final All-Sky Release

The columns in this table are as follows:


Last Updated: 29 July 2002
R. Cutri - IPAC